What Each Entry Shows
Every project below records the same things: the application, the municipality that decided it, the sector, the work we did and the outcome with its date. They are written to one shape so you can compare them, and so you can find the one closest to your own property.
The part worth reading is what the matter turned on. Almost every application is decided by a single thing; parking, a title condition, bulk services, a neighbour, a scheme that had changed since the rights were granted, and that is the sentence each entry is built around. It is also the sentence a firm can only write about work it actually did.
Filter by application below, or use the links at the foot of the page to find work in your municipality or your sector.
What every entry records
- Application
- The route taken, and the rights sought
- Municipality
- And the by-law it was decided under
- Location
- The suburb, or the area where a client is not named
- Scope
- What we did, and which specialists were engaged
- Outcome
- Approved, refused, withdrawn or lodged — with the date
What Is Not Here
Most planning work never appears on a page like this. Some clients will not be named, a developer assembling land, an owner resolving a contravention, an institution that would rather its plans stayed private, and where permission is not given, an entry either shows the suburb without the owner, or does not run at all.
Nor is every matter an approval. Applications are refused, withdrawn after an assessment shows they will not succeed, or settled at the Tribunal on conditions nobody wanted. We publish some of those too, because a portfolio of nothing but approvals tells you only which matters a firm chose to show.
If you want more than this page
References
We will put you in touch with clients who have agreed to speak, in the kind of matter you are bringing.
The documents
In a consultation we can show you what a motivation, a site development plan or a Tribunal bundle actually looks like — where we have permission, or with the details removed.
The ones that went badly
Ask about the matters that did not go our way. It is usually a more useful conversation than the ones that did.
Find Work Like Yours
The grid above filters by application. If you would rather start from where your property is, or from what you are building, these are the pages behind each, what the application involves, which by-law decides it, and what usually decides the outcome.
By application
By municipality
By sector
Nothing here quite like your property? That is usual — most matters are unlike the last one. The first consultation is free, and it starts with what your land permits now.
Questions about these Projects
What people ask about the work shown here and about the work that is not.
Bringing something similar?
Send the erf number and what you want to do with the property.
Yes, where a client has agreed to it. Tell us what kind of matter you are bringing and we will put you in touch with someone whose matter was similar, rather than whoever we spoke to last. A reference is only useful when the two matters actually resemble each other.
Because they have not agreed to it, and we do not publish a client's business without permission. Land assembly, contravention notices and institutional projects are the usual reasons — in each, being named could affect the matter itself. Where we do not have consent, an entry gives the suburb and the application without the owner, or it does not run.
Only if you agree to it in writing, after the matter is finished. Nothing is published while an application is live, and nothing is published at all without your consent. If you would rather no record of the matter appeared anywhere, say so at the outset and we will note it on the file.
Probably — but ask rather than infer it from this page. What is published is a small selection of matters we had permission to show; it is not the range of work we do. The service pages set out what we take on, and the first consultation is the quickest way to find out whether your matter is one of them.
Every entry carries the date of the decision. Planning frameworks change — Tshwane replaced its land use scheme in 2024 and Cape Town's latest by-law amendment took effect in October 2025 — so an older matter shows how something was decided then, not necessarily how it would be decided now. Where the framework has since changed, the entry says so.
A refusal is not always the end. Depending on the ground given, the options are an appeal, a fresh application that answers the reason for refusal, or a different route to the same outcome. What matters is the ground and the date, because appeal periods are short. Our Tribunal Representation page sets out how appeals run.
Speak to a Planner
Tell us the erf number and what you want to do with the property. The first consultation is free, we will tell you what the land permits, which application it needs, and what a matter like yours usually turns on.
35 Fricker Road, Illovo, Sandton · Planning matters across eight municipalities